Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1129 (CAL)

MAYA SARKAR & ORS. v. M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION

FAT/396/2006 · 2026-02-18

Md Shabbar Rashidi, Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

18.02.2026 Court No.13 Item No.1 pk FAT 396 of 2006 CAN 2 of 2006(Old No: CAN 6643 of 2006) CAN 3 of 2007 (Old No: 7869 of 2007) CAN 5 of 2025 Maya Sarkar and others Vs. M/s. Indian Oil Corporation and another Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das, Mr. Dipendu Sarkar ..for the appellants. Mr. Victor Chatterjee, Ms. S. Ghosh, Mr. Amit Ghosh …for the respondent no. 1. Mr. Shamik Chatterjee, Mr. Aditya Bikram Mahata, Mr. Sahis Kabir … for the respondent no. 2. 1. It is submitted by counsel for the appellants that despite repeated efforts, they are not able to contact their clients. A letter addressed to their clients has been returned “unclaimed”. 2. Let copies of envelope and letter filed in Court are taken on record. 3. It appears that the appellants are no more interested to proceed with the instant appeal. The appeal may have become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. Accordingly, the instant appeal shall stand dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, all connected pending applications, if any, shall also stand dismissed. 2 5. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order and duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)