Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:271
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 841 of 2021 1 - Saurabh Pandey S/o Chandrahash Pandey, Aged About 31 Years R/o Janakpur Road, Takhatpur, Tahsil And Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chandrahash Pandey S/o Late Parmeshwar Dutt Pandey, Aged About 59 Years R/o Janakpur Road, Takhatpur, Tahsil And Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Saroj Pandey W/o Chandrahash Pandey, Aged About 52 Years R/o Janakpur Road, Takhatpur, Tahsil And Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shubham Pandey S/o Chandrahash Pandey, Aged About 26 Years R/o Janakpur Road, Takhatpur, Tahsil And Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - Station House Officer, Police Station Balco, District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Rashmi Shukla (Pandey) W/o Saurabh Pandey D/o Vinay Kumar Shukla, Aged About 30 Years Presently R/o Qtr. No. 89, Sector- 1, Type-B, Balco Nagar, Police Station Balco, District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sourabh Sonwani, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, Dy. G.A. MADHURIMA THAKUR Digitally signed by MADHURIMA THAKUR Date: 2026.01.05 17:46:27 +0530
2
Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 05/01/2026
1. Heard Mr. Sourabh Sonwani, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, learned Dy. Government Advocate, appearing for the State.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition by quashing the FIIR No. 83/2021, in the interest of justice.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has been acquitted by the learned trial court.
4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice
Madhurima