CRWP-3587 IN THE HIGH (208 ) LUKMAN STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. detenue Ms. Ruksar has been produced by respondent No.3 in the Court. The respondent No.4, who is her Attorney on behalf of respondent No.4 has been filed. 2. who is her father and has stated that she has been lawfully married with respondent No residing with him. 3587-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Nafeesh Ahmed, Advocate for Mr. Afzal Hussain, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana Dr. Kirandeep kaur, Advocate for respondent No.4 *** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) Joint Reply by respondents No.1 to 3 has been filed. detenue Ms. Ruksar has been produced by respondent No.3 in the Court. The respondent No.4, who is her husband is present in the Court. Power o Attorney on behalf of respondent No.4 has been filed. The detenue Ms. Ruksar is not willing to go who is her father and has stated that she has been lawfully married with respondent No.4 on 28.03.2026. She is major and residing with him. COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3587-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA for for the petitioner Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana ate for respondent No.4 No.1 to 3 has been filed. The detenue Ms. Ruksar has been produced by respondent No.3 in the Court. is present in the Court. Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent No.4 has been filed. The detenue Ms. Ruksar is not willing to go with the petitioner, who is her father and has stated that she has been lawfully married with major and has been voluntarily Date of decision : 18.04.2026 .. Petitioner The detenue Ms. Ruksar has been produced by respondent No.3 in the Court. f with the petitioner, who is her father and has stated that she has been lawfully married with has been voluntarily AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.18 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-3587 3. withdrawal of the petition. 4. 5. 18.04.2026 Amit Sharma 3587-2026 (O&M) (2) In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition. Ordered accordingly. Dismissed as withdrawn. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.18 13:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.