APHC010208642023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 10894/2023 Between: 1. YEKULA SYAMA SUNDARA SURESH, S/O. LATE Y. PANDURANGA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC.ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER WORKING IN A.P. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., R/O.FLAT NO.302, AVANTHIKA JAHNAVI APARTMENTS, PLOT NO.557, MATHRU SRI NAGAR, MIYAPUR, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT. BY SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT. BY SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. A P INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, REPT. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, 12-455, WARD NO.12, BYPASS ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DIST - 522 501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of respondents in enhancing the age of superannuation from 60 yrs to 62 yrs for the employees working in 3rd respondent Corporation in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, 2 dt.31-01-2022 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal violation of Articles 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to enhance the age of superannuation of the petitioner from 60 yrs to 62 yrs on par with the Government employees in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, dt.31-01-2022 issued by the 1st respondent in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.3 to continue the petitioner in service till he attains the age of superannuation of 62 years in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, dt.31-01- 2022 issued by the 1st respondent with all the consequential benefits including regular pay and allowances pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR 2. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the same, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the present Writ Petition. 3. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date.19.09.2026 SR