Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11275 (AP)

Vatukula Rama Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

CRLP/11170/2025 · 2026-09-16

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010575672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11170/2025 Between: 1. VATUKULA RAMA RAO,, S/O. VATUKULA LAXMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT.62 YEARS, OCC WATHCMAN, R/O.SY NO. 146/P, PLOT N0.73, VISHNU ELITE APARTMENT, FLAT NO.LOL, NRI COLONY, PRAGATHI NAGAR, NIZAMPET, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA- 500090. 2. VATUKULA RADHA,, W/O.RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT. 58 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O.SY NO. 146/P, PLOT NO.73, VISHNU ELITE APARTMENT, FLAT NO.LOL, NRI COLONY, PRAGATHI NAGAR, NIZAMPET, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA-500090. 3. VATUKULA BALU,, S/O. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. PVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O.SY NO. 146/P, PLOT NO.73, VISHNU ELITE APARTMENT, FLAT NO.LOL, NRI COLONY, PRAGATHI NAGAR, NIZAMPET, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA-500090. 4. VATUKULA SOUNDARYA,, W/O.VISAIVIJAYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O.FLAT NO.304, 4TH FLOOR, RUDHRA'S KUTEER APARTMENT, PRAGATHI NAGAR, HYDERABAD,TELANGANA-500090 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI, THROUGH SHO PS PATHAPATNAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. GOKAVALASA JANAKI, W/O VATUKULA RAMU, AGE 28 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.5-23, 2ND LINE,YASHODA NAGAR, PATHAPATNAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to Quash the FIR No. 108 of 2025 on the file of P.S Pathapatnam, Srikakulam District on 07-10-2025 under sections 85 BNS, 3&4 of DPA in respect of the petitioners herein IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of the FIR No. 108 of 2025 on the file of P.S Pathapatnam, Srikakulam District on 07-10-2025 IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in FIR No. 108 of 2025 on the file of P.S Pathapatnam, Srikakulam District on 07-10-2025 under sections 85 BNS, 3&4 of DPA in respect of the petitioners herein including the arrest of the petitioners pending disposal of above criminal petition Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. V RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11170 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: Instant Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the petitioners herein (A2 to A5), seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR in Crime No.108 of 2025 of P.S. Pathapatnam Police Station, Srikakulam District, for the offences punishable under Sections 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 2. At the stage of admission, this Court has not granted any interim order in the instant lis. 3. Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent-State, basing on the written instructions, submits that the police have filed a charge sheet in FIR in Crime No.108 of 2025 of P.S. Pathapatnam Police Station, Srikakulam District, before the jurisdictional Magistrate. 4. At that juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with a liberty to challenge the charge sheet. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, by granting liberty to work out their legal remeides, in accordance with the law. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 17.09.2026 RMR 125 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11170 of 2025 Date: 17.09.2026 RMR