IN TH 102 Jagdish Si Abhay Si Taxation Haryana, P CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o Division Singh vs. S “….period 09.2.2026 20.2.2026 be passed automatic e COCP-1997-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1997 o Date of decision ish Singh Versus ay Singh, HCS, Collector (Excis tion Commissioner, Excise and ana, Panchkula and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 17.2.2026 (An Bench of this Court in CWP-48 h vs. State of Haryana and others”, w riod given to the petitioner to 026 is extended for another three 026 and would necessarily be subje ssed by revisional authority, ther atic extension of this concession….”. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1997 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-29.04.2026 …..Petitioner (Excise-cum-Joint Excise and and Taxation Department, …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a 4860-2026 titled as “Jagdish , whereby it was directed that to comply with order dated hree days from today i.e. till ubject to any order which may thereafter there shall be no ….”. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 17.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document without pa 21.2.2026. submission that the de the petition Division B been effect is no violat there must Court. In was granted which may violation m petition is h April 29, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-1997-2026 (O & M) It is submitted by learned cou out passing any order, the demoliti .2026. Learned counsel for the S issions made by learned counsel for the demolition has been effected on t petitioner on 21.2.2026 i.e. after the sion Bench. It is further pointed out t effected only after following due pro violation of the Writ Court order. Heard. It is well settled that for invo must be willful and deliberate disob t. In the present case, grace period granted to the petitioner only upto 20.2 h may be passed by the Revisional A ion made out of the order dated 17.2.2 In view of the above noted f ion is hereby dismissed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ed counsel for the petitioner that emolition has been effected on the State has controverted the el for the petitioner and submits d on the illegal encroachment of ter the period stipulated by the d out that the said demolition has ue procedure and therefore there r invoking contempt jurisdiction, disobedience of the order of the eriod of extension of three days to 20.2.2026; subject to any order nal Authority. Thus, there is no 17.2.2026. oted facts, the present contempt if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 17.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-1997-2026 (O & M) 3 VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 17.41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document