NEELAM RAMA SUBBAMMA v. NEELAM HIMABINDU @ V. ADI LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS
MACMA/2333/2009 · 2026-09-21
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11274 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11274 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010129702009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2333/2009
Between:
NEELAM RAMA SUBBAMMA, W/O. LATE SUBBARAYUDU HOUSEHOLD R/O. H.NO. 1-161, EDIGAPALEM STREET, RAJAMPET, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. NEELAM HIMABINDU V ADI LAKSHMI AND 3 OTHERS, W/O.
LATE NEELAM VENKATA SUBRAMANYAM VARAPRASAD R/O. 13/13, SAINATHAPURAM, MYDUKUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
2. NEELAM SAI SNEHA, D/O. LATE N.V.S. VARAPRASAD MINOR REP. BY MOTHER I.E., RESPONDENT NO.1 R/O. 13/13, SAINATHAPURAM, MYDUKUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. K SURESH BABU, S/O. K. PRASAD R/O. D.NO. 14-301, SAINATHAPURAM, MYDUKUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER PRODDATUR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court being aggrieved by the award and decree dated 17.10.2006 passed in O.P. No. 75 of 2003 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal- cum-II Addl. District Judge, Kadapa, at Proddatur, for the following among other
Counsel for the Appellant:
VENKATESHWAR VARANASI
2
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY
2. A JAYANTHI
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
1. Despite the
learned counsel on record represented the appellant/claimant No.3, none appeared for the appellant, when the matter is taken up for hearing. It is evident from the record that the appeal is of the year, 2009 and the accident occurred on 11.12.2002, but the appellant did not evince any interest to prosecute the matter, thereby, the same is liable for dismissal.
2. Therefore, the M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed for non prosecution. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 22.09.2026 Krs
3
59
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
M.A.C.M.A.No.2333 of 2009
( JUDGMENT )
DATE: 22.09.2026
Krs