Karthi @ Karthick v. State Represented by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/5796/2026 · 2026-03-06
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11270 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11270 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 5796 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 5796 of 2026 Karthi @ Karthick S/o.Moorthy, No. 1/318, Kalathumettu Street, Kottivakkam, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai -41. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented by: The Inspector of Police Neelankarai Police Station, Chennai District. Crime No. 726/2025 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 726/2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Neelankarai Police Station, Chennai District on such terms and conditions as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr. P.Chandrasekar For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side). ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.06.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 310(2) and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5796 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 311 of B.N.S. in Crime No.726 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and demanded money at knife point. When the defacto complainant refused to give money, the accused abused him, assaulted and threatened him with dire consequences and the accused also snatched mobile phone from him. Hence the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that this is a put up case and he is ready and willing to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and hence prayed to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) strongly objected to enlarge the petitioner on bail by stating that there are 5 other previous cases and out of which, two cases were registered under Section 302 of IPC and other cases are registered under Section 324 of IPC. 5. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate, it appears that the petitioner has been under incarceration since 22.12.2025 as he https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5796 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 involved in the offence of snatching of a cell phone.
Though he has been under judicial custody for the past nearly two months, considering the fact that there are previous cases of gr nature, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is misusing the liberty granted to him by this Court and therefore, this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06-03-2026 MJS Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 2. The Inspector Of Police, Neelankarai Police Station, Chennai District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 5796 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MJS CRL OP No. 5796 of 2026 06-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis