Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1127 (GUJ)

ZEBUNBEN JAKIRSHA SHAHAMDAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/12380/2026 · 2026-06-03

Ilesh J Vora

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.MA/12380/2026 ORDER DATED: 03/06/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 12380 of 2026 ========================================================= ZEBUNBEN JAKIRSHA SHAHAMDAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================= Appearance: MR. VIPUL SAVDAS REVDARIYA(14299) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. RONAK RAVAL. ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA Date : 03/06/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent State. 2. The applicant, by way of this application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11203025260100 of 2026 registered with Junagadh Taluka Police Station, Dist. Junagadh, for the offences punishable under Sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), 317(4), 317(5) and 54 of BNS. 3. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that he is suffering confinement since 06.03.2026. He further submitted that the applicant has not played any vital role in the alleged offence. Hence, further detention of the applicant is unwarranted. 4. Learned APP has opposed the bail application contending that, R/CR.MA/12380/2026 ORDER DATED: 03/06/2026 considering the conduct of the applicant and nature of accusation, the discretion may not be exercised in favour of the applicant. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties and upon perusal of the material placed on record, it appears that the applicant, a lady accused, had not participated in the alleged offence. The only role attributed to her is that she had mortgaged the stolen ornaments with a goldsmith and, after paying the outstanding amount, sold it to a third party. In such circumstances, having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case and upon imposing stringent conditions, I am inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant, as keeping the applicant behind bars would not serve any useful purpose. Hence, the bail application is allowed. In such circumstances, considering the role attributable to present applicant herein and evidence in support of charge, without commenting on merits of the matter, I deemed it fit to release the applicant on bail. Hence, present application is allowed. 6. Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No. 11203025260100 of 2026 registered with Junagadh Taluka Police Station, Dist. Junagadh, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall: No. Conditions (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; R/CR.MA/12380/2026 ORDER DATED: 03/06/2026 (b) not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; (d) not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned; (e) furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court; (f) Shall not enter in jurisdiction area of Junagadh Taluka for a period of 1 years except for mark her presence before the concerned Court as well as Police Station, if any. 7. The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not required in connection with the any other offence. If breach of any above condition is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned shall take appropriate action or issue warrant against the applicant. The bail bond to be executed before the learned trial Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the sessions judge concerned to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. Nothing stated hereinabove, shall tantamount to the expression of any opinion on the merits of this case. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service permitted. (ILESH J. VORA,J) Mehul Desai Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: MEHULKUMAR BHIMABHAI DESAI(HCD0075), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/06/2026 11:30:14