Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11269 (GAU)

SRI NAKUL DAS v. STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/310/2026 · 2026-07-27

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010265252025 2026:GAU-AS:10326 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/310/2026 SRI NAKUL DAS SON OF SABIN DAS RESIDENT OF AMINGAON, MIRIENPARA, NORTH GUWAHATI, KAMRUP, ASSAM, 781030 VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2:SMTI RITA CHOUDHURY WIFE OF LATE SRI DINESH CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF AMINGAON MIRIENPARA NORTH GUWAHATI KAMRUP ASSAM 78103 Advocate for the Petitioner : , MS. B SARMA, LEGAL AID COUNSEL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. M K BROWN, AMICUS CURIAE R-2 Linked Case : EC/0/0 SRI NAKUL DAS SON OF SABIN DAS RESIDENT OF AMINGAON MIRIENPARA NORTH GUWAHATI KAMRUP Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM 781030 VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF THE HONBLE GAUHATI HIGH COURT 2:SMTI RITA CHOUDHURY WIFE OF LATE SRI DINESH CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF AMINGAON MIRIENPARA NORTH GUWAHATI KAMRUP ASSAM 781030 ------------ Advocate for : MR ASHIM CHAMUAH Advocate for : appearing for STATE OF ASSAM Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 SRI NAKUL DAS SON OF SABIN DAS RESIDENT OF AMINGAON MIRIENPARA NORTH GUWAHATI KAMRUP ASSAM 781030 VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF THE HONBLE GAUHATI HIGH COURT 2:SMTI RITA CHOUDHURY WIFE OF LATE SRI DINESH CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF AMINGAON MIRIENPARA NORTH GUWAHATI KAMRUP ASSAM 781030 ------------ Page No.# 3/4 Advocate for : MR ASHIM CHAMUAH Advocate for : appearing for STATE OF ASSAM B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 28.07.2026 Heard Ms. B Sarma, learned Legal Aid counsel for the petitioner. Also heard the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam as well as Ms. M K Brown, learned Amicus Curiae representing for respondent No. 2. This I.A has been preferred for condonation of delay of 344 days. Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and the learned Amicus Curiae submits that they have no objection to the condonation of the delay. Having perused the reason stated in the I.A, this Court is inclined to condone the delay in preferring the connected jail appeal. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. I.A stands disposed of. JUDGE Page No.# 4/4 Comparing Assistant