[2026:RJ-JP:29147] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10629/2026 CNR: RJHC020637582026 | URN: CRLMB / 19722U / 2026 1. Vijay S/o Mastram, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Bagwali Dhani, Kushtala, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (At present District Jail, District Sawai Madhopur) 2. Vijay S/o Ramkesh, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Bagwali Dhani, Kushtala, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (At present District Jail, District Sawai Madhopur) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashindra Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 28/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 22.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 98/2026 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 of BNS, Sections 66(C), 66(D) of IT Act and Section 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the [2026:RJ-JP:29147] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10629/2026] accused-petitioners are in custody since long. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 14.05.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Vijay S/o Mastram & Vijay S/o Ramkesh are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is [2026:RJ-JP:29147] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10629/2026] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their present address along with mobile number to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile number and their address. In case, the accused-petitioners changes their address or mobile number, they shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioners are further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the applications against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and S.H.O. through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 65/HEENA