Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11266 (CHH)

SAKRAM KURRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/773/2022 · 2026-01-05

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:558-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 773 of 2022 1 - Sakram Kurre S/o Bisahu Kurre Aged About 67 Years 2 - Shyam Bai Satnami W/o Sakram Kurre Aged About 55 Years 3 - Pawan S/o Sakram Kurre Aged About 31 Years 4 - Ranu W/o Pawan Aged About 23 Years All R/o House No. 10, Village Junwani, Post Junwani, Sub District Bilaigarh , District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh (Present Address As Per Aadhar Card) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent of Police Baloda Bazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Station House Officer Police Station Bhatgaon, Baloda Bazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Punbai Kurre W/o Gautam Kurre Aged About 32 Years D/o Resham Lal Burman, R/o Village Chisda, Sub Tahsil Police Station Hasoud, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Virendra Verma, Advocate For State /Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, GA For Respondent No.3 : Ms. Gayatri Chauhan, Advocate ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.01.07 10:45:31 +0530 2 / 3 Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 06/01/2026 1. Heard Mr. Virendra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, learned Government Advocate for the respondents No.1& 2/State and Ms. Gayatri Chauhan, learned counsel for Respondent No.3. 2. By way of the instant CRMP, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- “It is, therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the FIR No.61/2022 registered at Police Station Bhatgaon, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar – Bhatapara (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 3. At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the trial emanated from the FIR No.61/2022 registered at Police Station Bhatgaon, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, C.G. has been concluded and the petitioners have been acquitted from the charges leveled against them and the instant petition has become infructuous. 4. Learned State counsel do not dispute the above submission. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the 3 / 3 petitioners, the instant CRMP is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ashu