APHC010686242016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 28317 OF 2016 Between: 1. B.Musalappa, s/o Yerrappa, aged about 69 years, occ: Ex-Serviceman, r/o H.No. 10-145A, A-1, Ramalaxmamma Veedhi, Markapur, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Andhra Pradesh Information Commission, Rep. by its Chairman, H.No. 5-4-399 Ground Floor, Samara Hakku Bhavan Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The Appellate Authority under RTI Act, Revenue Divisional Office, Beeravanagar, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 4. The Information Officer under RTI Act, Mandal Revenue Office, Near Clock Tower Opp.Shanthi theatre, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not passing any orders in the appeal bearing No. 2 19811/2016/LTK flied on 14-6-2016 inspite of the 'repeated visits made by the petitioner, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in contravention of provisions of Section 19 (6) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 35066 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to forthwith dispose of the appeal No. No. 19811/2016/LTK filed on 14-6-2016 in terms of the provisions of Section 19 (6) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, during the pendency of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: VENKATA REDDY CHITTEM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU( SC FOR AP INFORMATION COMMISSION) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) The Court made the following 3 ORDER: Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr. Venkat Reddy Chittem, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that no further cause survives in this matter and that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 16.09.2026 KGR/APSK