Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11261 (BOM)

ASHOK VINAYAK DESHMUKH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MAHA. THR. SECY., DEPT. OF AGRI., ANIMAL HUS. DAIRY DEVPT. AND FISHERIES, MUMBAI AND ORS

WP/805/2022 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 5. wp5142.19 & ors connected petitions.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5142/2019 Smt.Sundarabai Shantaram Sirsat ..vs.. State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Agriculture & Animal Husbandary, Dairy Development & Fisheries, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO.5149/2019 Shri Subhash s/o Gangaram Taksalkar, thr.LRs ..vs.. State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Agriculture & Animal Husbandary, Dairy Development & Fisheries, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3103/2020 Prakash s/o anandrao Mankar ..vs.. State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Mantralaya, Mumbai-22 and ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3103/2021 Ramesh Rajaram Chakre and ors ..vs.. State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Mantralaya, Mumbai-22 and ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3948/2021 Prakash Fafurda Ingle and ors ..vs.. State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Mantralaya, Mumbai-22 and ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO.805/2022 Ashok Vinayak Deshmukh and ors ..vs.. State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Mantralaya, Mumbai-22 and ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO.806/2022 Harichandra Parasram Dolaskar and ors ..vs.. 2 5. wp5142.19 & ors connected petitions.odt State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Mantralaya, Mumbai-22 and ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1044/2022 Aniket Ashru Jadhao and ors ..vs.. State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Mantralaya, Mumbai-22 and ors WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1083/2022 Ramesh Mahadeo Shirale and ors ..vs.. State of Mah., thr.Deputy Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Mantralaya, Mumbai-22 and ors Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court' s or Judge' s Order Coram, appearances, Court' s Orders or directions and Registrar' s order WRIT PETITION NO.5142/2019 Mrs.S.W.Deshpande, Counsel for the Petitioner. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri A.R.Patil, Counsel for Respondent No.2. WRIT PETITION NO.5149/2019 Mrs.S.W.Deshpande, Counsel for the Petitioner. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri A.R.Patil, Counsel for Respondent No.2. WRIT PETITION NO.3103/2020 Shri C.B.Dharmadhikari, Counsel for Petitioner. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for the State. WRIT PETITION NO.3103/2021 Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari, Counsel for Petitioners. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri A.R.Patil, Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. WRIT PETITION NO.3948/2021 Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari, Counsel for Petitioners. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri A.R.Patil, Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. WRIT PETITION NO.805/2022 Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari, Counsel for Petitioners. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1. 3 5. wp5142.19 & ors connected petitions.odt Shri A.R.Patil, Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. WRIT PETITION NO.806/2022 Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari, Counsel for Petitioners. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri Z.Z.Haq, Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. WRIT PETITION NO.1044/2022 Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari, Counsel for Petitioners. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri Z.Z.Haq, Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. WRIT PETITION NO.1083/2022 Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari, Counsel for Petitioners. Shri A.M.Madiwale, AGP for Respondent No.1. Shri Z.Z.Haq, Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE & RAJ D.WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2026. 1. Heard. 2. Prayer in these petitions is to direct respondents to pay arrears of equal pay for equal work with interest to petitioners in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.8640- 8659/1997 dated 24.7.2001. 3. Learned counsel appearing for respective petitioners have also relied upon the judgment passed by this Curt in Writ Petition No.2222/2002 along with connected writ petitions decided on 15.2.2019. They further relied upon Government Resolution dated 20.3.2025 and contended that it clearly covers the case of petitioners. 4. Learned AGP as well as learned counsel for respondent No.1 has also not disputed the said position. 5. This court has already considered this aspect in Writ Petition No.6389/2025 and directed that issue raised in the petition can be 4 5. wp5142.19 & ors connected petitions.odt decided by respondent No.1 in the light of aforesaid judgments and the Government Resolution. 6. Learned counsel Shri A.C.Dharmadhikari submits that in some of cases, representations are rejected, but representations in present petitions are not rejected and, therefore, the similar order can be passed in present petitions. 7. In view of that, we direct respondent No.1 to decide issue raised in these petitions by treating the present petitions as representations and take to its logical end within a period of eight weeks. 8. Learned counsel for petitioners undertakes to produce copy of petitions along with orders passed today before respondent No.1 within a period of two weeks. 9. With these directions, writ petitions are disposed of. 10. The communication dated 25.2.2026 will not come in the way of respondent No.1 while deciding the said representations. [JUDGE] [JUDGE] !! BrWankhede !! Signed by: Mr. B. R. Wankhede Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 24/09/2026 10:08:21