Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11260 (ALL)

RASHEED KHAN v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/5665/2026 · 2026-09-28

Vivek Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 5665 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Affidavit of compliance filed today by the learned A.G.A. is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 28 of 2025, under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1) of B.N.S., Police Station - Gorai, District Aligarh, with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail. 4. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that the final report has been submitted in the present case on 25.08.2026. The applicant has no apprehension of his arrest, therefore, the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. 5. On being confronted with this, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail application be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application at the appropriate stage, if so required. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghubir Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi Rasheed Khan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 8. Certified copies of relevant documents be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photostat copies of the same. September 29, 2026 A.P. Pandey NABAIL No. 5665 of 2026 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad