Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11259 (CHH)

AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. v. BHAGWAT PRASAD KASHYAP

WPC/6680/2025 · 2026-01-04

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:267 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6680 of 2025 Au Small Finance Bank Ltd. Through- Authorized Dheeraj Kumar Pandey, Registered Office -19/a, Dhuleshwar Garden Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan Branch Office Bilaspur Through Its Manager Dheeraj Pandey Son Of Vivekanand Pandey Aged About- 44 Years Branch Office 3rd Floor Skai Park Near Bhatia Nursing Home Canal Road Raja Talab Raipur Chhattisgarh, ... Petitioner versus 1 - Bhagwat Prasad Kashyap S/o Jhaduram Kashyap Aged About 37 Years (Proprietor Rikhi Dona Pattal Store) Resident Of Ward No. 05, Gali No.01, Mahima Nagar, Sirgitt, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rikhiram Kashyap S/o Bhagwat Prasad Kashyap Aged About 70 Years Resident Of Ward No. 05, Gali No.01, Mahima Nagar, Sirgitt, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Collector, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Rev) Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Tahsildar Tahsil Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Dewangan, Advocate and Mr. Pawan Kashyap, Advocate For State : Mrs. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 05.01.2026 1. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for issuance of direction to the Tahsildar to decide the pending application/representation filed by the petitioner in compliance of order dated 17.07.2025 passed by 2 learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur in M.J.C. Criminal Case No. 653/2025. 2. From perusal of the records annexed with the petition, it is quite vivid that the petitioner has already submitted an application/representation dated 15.09.2025 before the Tahsildar. It is expected that the Tahsildar shall proceed expeditiously in accordance with law without undue delay tactics adopted either by the Tahsildar or by private respondents. 3. With this observation, the instant writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika