Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11258 (AP)

C SUBRAMANYAM v. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF AP

WP/22321/2025 · 2026-09-22

Ninala Jayasurya, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010430552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 23 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No: Between: 1. C SUBRAMANYAM, S/o. JUNIOR ASSISTANT SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 1. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF AP, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR, ADMN. AMARAVATHI, 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE PRINCIPAL DIST JUDGE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): Mr. G VIVEKANAND 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No: 22321 of 2025 C SUBRAMANYAM, S/o.LATE KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, R/o.PRINCIPLAL JR.CIVIL JUDGE, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF AP, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR, ADMN. AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR THE PRINCIPAL DIST JUDGE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3543] LATE KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, PRINCIPLAL JR.CIVIL JUDGE, ...PETITIONER THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF AP, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR THE PRINCIPAL DIST JUDGE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 The Court made the following order: (Per NJS, J) Mr.B.Surya Chandra, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause does not survive for adjudication and seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 23.09.2026 BLV 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P.No.22321 of 2025 Dt: 23.09.2026 BLV