Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21693 RP No. 573 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REVIEW PETITION NO. 573 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SRI NAGENDRA K S S/O LATE SHIVANNA @ SHIVAMALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT KERGUDDADAHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE - 560 090 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHETHAN B.C., ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT JAYASHREE D/O SRI BASAVARAJU W/O SRI NAGENDRA K.S AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT TARABANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKABANAVARA POST HESARAGHATTA POST, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE - 560 090 …RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC. 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 03.09.2025 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO. 22482/2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21693 RP No. 573 of 2025
ORAL ORDER The present review petition is filed seeking the following prayers:
"a) Review the order dated 03.09.2025 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 22482/2022 produced at ANNEXURE-F. b) Pass any order of consequential relief or any other appropriate order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity."
2. The review petition is filed seeking clarification of the order dated 03.09.2025, whereby this Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The said writ petition was filed questioning the order passed in an interlocutory application seeking maintenance in M.C. No. 236/2018. As the main M.C. itself was disposed of, this Court had observed that the writ petition had become infructuous.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/ husband submits that as on the date, by virtue of an interim
order granted by the Court, the petitioner has been paying a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the wife. It is further submitted that the respondents have initiated the recovery proceedings claiming
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:21693 RP No. 573 of 2025
arrears at Rs.15,000/-. The petitioner has the benefit of an interim order at Rs.10,000/- and the said aspect was not clarified by the court.
4. From the date of the interim order till the disposal of the M.C., the petitioner has to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/. Thereafter, as the interim order merged with the main order, the petitioner has to pay, as per the interim order an amount of Rs.15,000/-. This Court is not passing any order against the interest of the respondent, issuance of notice to the respondent is not necessary.
5. In view of the above, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER i. Accordingly, the review petition is disposed of. ii. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19