- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14570 WP No. 7816 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7816 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI R SRINATH ADOPTED S/O LATE B GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.202 SRI RENUKE ENCLAVE, L T ROAD KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOKESH R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT NIRMALA W/O SRI SANTOSH B D/O LATE GOPALA REDDY B AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT 454 16TH MAIN ROAD 1ST CROSS NISARGA LAYOUT HARAPANAHALLI JIGANI HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560105. 2. SMT SUVARNAMMA W/O LATE B GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NOSENOOR VILLAGE Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14570 WP No. 7816 of 2026 JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562106. 3. SMT G ROOPA W/O RAVINDRA P K D/O LATE B GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT NO.5 KRISHNAREDDY LAYOUT PANATHUR BENGALURU-560103. 4. SRI DIWAKAR @ MANJUNATH S/O LATE B GOPALA REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NOSENOOR VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT-562106 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE ORDER DATED: 17.04.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE A PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, VIDE ANNEXURE A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has called in question the compromise decree passed on 17.04.2025 before II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14570 WP No. 7816 of 2026 2. The Apex Court, in the case of Triloki Nath Singh vs. Anirudh Singh (D) Thr. Lrs & Ors. reported in (2020) 6 SCC 629, has held that a person questioning the lawfulness of a compromise decree must approach the same Court which recorded the compromise decree. 3. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has to approach the same Court which recorded the compromise decree for appropriate relief. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Competent Authority, in accordance with law, if so advised. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 31