Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11253 (CAL)

SUSMITA SARKAR ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/23874/2023 · 2026-02-03

Suvra Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

February 3, 2026 (20) ARDR WPA 23874 of 2023 Susmita Roy (Sarkar) Vs. The State of West Bengal & ors. Adv. Ramkrishna Bhattacharjee, Adv. Koushik Chowdhury, Adv. Dwaipayan Panda, Adv. Tridib Das, … for the petitioner. Adv. Ashim Kumar Ganguly, Adv. Jyotsna Roy Mukherjee, Adv. P. Dutta, …for the State. The petitioner alleges that the complaint lodged by her against the private respondents on 11th September, 2023 has not been acted upon. In that event the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175 of the BNSS. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)