APHC010481082026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26449/2026 Between: 1. THIMMIGARI GUNA SEKHAR, S/O. T.SANKARAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO.3-40, S.0 COLONY, PENNAGADAM VILLAGE, PAPANAIDUPETA POST, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. THIMMIGARI CHANDU, S/O. T.SANKARAIAH, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, RIO. D.NO.3-40, S.0 COLONY, PENNAGADAM VILLAGE, PAPANAIDUPETA POST, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, PENNAGADAM VILLAGE, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. Page 2 of 4 7. M BODANNA MODALI, S/O. DHARMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED EMPLOYEE, RIO. PAPANAIDUPETA VILLAGE AND POST, YERPEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent Nos.4 to 6 in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners' lands admeasuring Ac.0.85 Cents situated in Sy.No.127/5 of Pennagadam Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District, at the instance of 7th respondent, without issuing any notice to petitioners, without following the due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India, Consequently direct Respondent Nos.4 to 7 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners' lands admeasuring Ac.0.85 Cents situated in Sy.No.127/5 of Pennagadam Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct Respondent Nos.4 to 7 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners' lands admeasuring Ac.0.85 Cents situated in Sy.No.127/5 of Pennagadam Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SUNNI MUNEER BASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: Heard Sri Sunni Muneer Basha, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondents 1 to 6. The notice in respect of the 7th respondent is dispensed with since no adverse order has been passed affecting his rights or interests. Page 3 of 4 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that respondents 4 to 6 are interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over an extent of Ac.0.85 cents in Sy.No.127/5 of Pennagadam Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District, without issuing any notice. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are the absolute owners and possessors of an extent of Ac.0.85 cents in Sy.No.127/5 of Pennagadam Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District. A copy of the Pattadar Passbook is filed as Ex.P3, and a copy of the ROR 1(B) Certificate is filed as Ex.P4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that respondents 4 to 6, without issuing any notice, are trying to dispossess the petitioners. 4. Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondents 4 to 6 are not interfering with an extent of Ac.0.85 cents in Sy.No.127/5 of Pennagadam Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing respondents 4 to 6 not to interfere with an extent of Ac.0.85 cents in Sy.No.127/5 of Pennagadam Village, Yerpedu Mandal, Tirupati District, without following due procedure. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 17.09.2026 SNI 213 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26449 OF 2026 Date: 17.09.2026 SNI