Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11241 (PNJ)

SUKHCHAIN SINGH @ VIJAY v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/18209/2026 · 2026-04-30

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-18209-202 IN THE HIGH CO (205) SUKHCHAIN SING STATE OF PUNJA CORAM: HON'B Present: Mr. Pun Mr. Ros ****  MANISHA BATRA 1. Through Suraksha Sanhita, 20 case FIR No.208 dat 115(2), 126(2), 352(2 short “BNS”) (Sectio Muktsar Sahib. 2. Vide or released on interim ba 3. Learned that the petitioner has custodial interrogation 2026 (O&M) (1) H COURT OF PUNJAB AND HAR SINGH @ VIJAY Versus UNJAB ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISH r. Puneet Sharma (Upmanyu), Advoca r. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab  ATRA, J. (ORAL) rough the instant petition under Section ita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’), the peti 8 dated 26.10.2025 registered under S 352(2), 324(2), 191(3), 190 of Bharat (Section 304 of BNS added later on) at ide order dated 06.04.2026 passed by rim bail and was directed to join investiga arned State counsel filed status report has joined the investigation on 16.04 gation. HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18209-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 30.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent NISHA BATRA  dvocate for the petitioner ection 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik he petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in nder Sections 118(2), 118(1), 117(2), Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for on) at Police Station City, District Sri ed by this Court, the petitioner was vestigation. eport dated 29.04.2026 and submitted 16.04.2026 and he is not required for M) 2026 oner garik il in 7(2), (for t Sri was itted or AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-18209-202 4. In view investigation and giv required. As such, w for release of petition is allowed and the or absolute, subject to BNSS. 5. Since th any, is rendered infru 30.04.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) view of the fact that the petitio nd given the nature of allegations, hi ch, without commenting on merits of petitioner on anticipatory bail is made the order 06.04.2026 granting interim ect to compliance of conditions laid ince the main petition has been dispo d infructuous. (MANI Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No    petitioner has already joined the ons, his pre-trial incarceration is not rits of case, it is observed that a case made out. Accordingly, the petition interim bail to the petitioner is made laid down in Section 482(2) of disposed of, pending application, if ANISHA BATRA) JUDGE es/No  the s not case tition ade ) of n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.