Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11241 (CAL)

KRISHNA SAHA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/78/2026 · 2026-02-02

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02/02/2026 M/L – 39 Court No.28 S. Kundu Rejected C.R.M.(A) 78 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Gazole P.S case no. 979 of 2023 dated 24/12/2023 under sections 341/323/324/307/34 of the IPC. In the matter of: Krishna Saha ...Petitioner. Mr. Avinaba Patra Mr. S. Ghosh …for the petitioner. Mr. Arindam Sen Ms. Debarshi Brahma …for the State. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there were allegations and counter- allegations. The altercation happened due to prior civil dispute between the parties. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the statements of the victim and the local witnesses implicating the present petitioner and to the injury report which shows infliction of injury of a vital part of the body like head. 3. Considering the above, the other incriminating materials available in the case diary and the fact that the petitioner had remained absconding since 2003, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2 4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)