Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4764 of 2026
Debendra Raula
….
Petitioner Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
….
Opp. Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 17.02.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition
with the following prayer: -
“The petitioner above named, therefore, pray that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue rule nisi calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the petitioner shall not be regularized. If the opposite parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the Opposite Party No.3 to regularize the present petitioner from the date of his entitlement for regularization.”
4.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has
filed a representation vide Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this
order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Basudev