Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:7163 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 190 of 2026
Danarul Sk. age about 68 years, S/o-Lt. Khawab Ali, resident of Village-Lakhanpur, P.O. Lakhanpur, P.S. Pakur (M), District-Pakur (Jharkhand)
....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opposite party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--- For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P
--- 03/16.03.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S.Case No. 242/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S) and under Section 27 of Arms Act, 1959, pending in the Court of S.D.J.M, Pakur.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the dying declaration the deceased had not stated the name of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in languishing in custody since 02.11.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He lastly submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this Court.
4. Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against this petitioner; as such, he does not deserve grant of regular bail.
5.
Having regard to the allegation made against this petitioner as well as gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
16th March, 2026
jk
Uploaded on
18/03/2026