[2026:RJ-JP:29858] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6700/2026 CNR: RJHC020403352026 | URN: CRLMB / 12102U / 2026 Shri Krishan Kumar Son Of Rammehar, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Naharpur, Police Station Manesar, District Gurugram, Haryana Presently M/s Laxmi Alloys, Rico Industries Area, Khushkheda, District Khairthal Tijara. (At Present Lodged In The Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through the Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anisha Yadav, Mr. Kapil Gupta, Mr. Rajender Prasad Yadav, Mr. Dharmender, Mr. Chitransh, Ms. Shivani Soni & Mr. Mukesh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.53/2026 registered at Police Station Khushkheda, District Bhiwadi for the offences under 112(2), 287, 288 & 61(2) BNS, 2023, Sections 4 & 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Sections 5 and 9B of the Explosive Act, 1884. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this criminal case merely being the owner of the alleged premise. She further submits that the accused- petitioner has given the alleged premise on rent to Hemant Kumar Sharma who is the Proprietor of M/s. Ganpati Industries. She further submits that the accused-petitioner has no knowledge for what purposes the other co-accused-Hemant Kumar Sharma was [2026:RJ-JP:29858] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6700/2026] making use of the rented premises. She also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.03.2026 and the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge- sheet in the matter and the trial of the case may take considerable time. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the accused-petitioner was well aware of the fact that the co-accused-Hemant Kumar Sharma was using the premises for storage of the explosive substances which resulted into the said tragedy. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers. 5. The Investigating Officer while arresting the present accused-petitioner has given out the reasons for his arrest in view of the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Vihan Kumar v. State of Haryana & Ors.) (Special Leave Petition (Crl) No.13320/2024) by mentioning that the accused- petitioner rented the premises to the co-accused-Hemant Kumar Sharma who was not having the permission/license for storage of explosive substances. While giving out the reasons for arrest of the co-accused-Hemant Kumar Sharma, the Investigating Officer has mentioned that the accused was making use of the rented premises for storage of the explosive substances and labours were being engaged there by putting their life in danger. 6. In view of the reasons of arrest disclosed to the accused- petitioner and the co-accused, it has come out that the accused- [2026:RJ-JP:29858] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6700/2026] petitioner rented his premises to Hemant Kumar Sharma who was making use of the said rented premises for storage of the explosive substances. 7. In view of the aforesaid facts, the allegations against the accused-petitioner is of giving out his premises on rent to the co- accused who has used the said premises for storage of the explosive substances, meaning thereby, the allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he has given his premises on rent to a person who without having permission/license used the premises for storage of explosive substances and the labours were engaged by putting their life in danger. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.03.2026. 8. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the allegation against the accused-petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 9. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 17/Ashish Kumar