[2026:RJ-JP:28911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11609/2026 CNR: RJHC020695822026 | URN: CRLMB / 21404U / 2026 Arman S/o Chand Mohammad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Shahin School, Gangapur City, Police Station Udei Mod, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Gangapur City). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of learned Trial Court dated 02.07.2026 on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 135/2026 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2) & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023, wherein charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 3(5), 117(2) & 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that the main allegation is against co-accused Azeej and Halim; [2026:RJ-JP:28911] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11609/2026] conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but did not dispute with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record and the contentions put forth by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has been filed; that no recovery has been made at the instance of the accused-petitioner; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioner; that the injuries sustained by the injured are attributed to co-accused Azeej, Rahees and Kasim; that co-accused person Halim has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 16.07.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10402/2026; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Arman S/o Chand Mohammad is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. [2026:RJ-JP:28911] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11609/2026] 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 77/HEENA