CRWP-4321 IN THE (150) BHINDER K STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official respon petitioners at t representation 2. submitted tha 14.04.2026 (A Taran raising same has not y further submit appropriate dir 4321-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH ER KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Sanjeev K. Virk, Advocate fo Mr. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ***
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fi tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondents No.2 and 3 to protect rs at the hands of respondents No.4 t tation dated 14.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned co d that the petitioners have recentl 26 (Annexure P-5) before the Senior ising their grievances as mentioned i s not yet been considered and no actio submitted that at this stage, the peti iate directions are issued to responden NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRWP-4321-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.04.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
cate for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the protect the life and liberty of the No.4 to 9 and to take action on their ure P-5). ed counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on enior Superintendent of Police, Tarn ioned in the present petition but the o action has been taken thereon. He e petitioners would be satisfied if pondent No.2-Senior Superintendent 2026 f the the the their has on Tarn t the . He ed if dent AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4321 of Police, Tar petitioners and 3. 4. notice on beha be done in du her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance w petitioners, the order to protec
16.04.2026 Amit Sharma 321-2026 (O&M) (2) e, Tarn Taran to decide the aforesa rs and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and in due course. Let a complete set of ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 14.04.2026 (An period of 15 days from today, by nce with law. Needless to say, if he official respondents would pro protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   foresaid representation filed by the reon. Senior DAG, Punjab, has advance te and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to yer made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is on to respondent No.2 to decide the 26 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners y, by passing a speaking order in ay, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

the ance will ed to thout n is e the ners er in the ity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.