HUSBAND OF THE VICTIM - CUM INFORMANT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5704/2025 · 2026-01-13
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11228 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11228 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:2373 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 5704 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5704 of 2025
1. Husband of the victim-cum-informant
2. Father-in-law of the victim-cum-informant
3. Mother-in-law of the victim-cum-informant
4. Nandosi of victim-cum-informant
5. Nanad of the victim-cum-informant
6. Brother-in-law of the victim-cum-informant … Petitioners
-Versus-
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Victim
… Opposite Parties
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Advocate
Mr. Kumar Harsh, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P. For the Victim
: Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate
-----
06/30.01.2026 This matter has been listed today on mention slip of the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that in Order No.05, dated 13.01.2026, petitioner no.4 is Nandosi of victim cum informant, however, it has been typed as Nanad of victim cum informant. He also submits that in paragraph no.3, after the mother-in-law, husband of sister-in-law was required to be typed, however, it was typed as sister-in-law. He submits that it appears that this has occurred inadvertently and in view of that, the same may kindly be rectified.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the State and victim also accept the said submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
4. It transpires that it has occurred inadvertently.
5. Let petitioner no.4 be read as Nandosi of victim cum informant in place of Nanad of victim cum informant in Order No.05, dated 13.01.2023. In paragraph no.3 at page 2 of the said order, after the mother-in-law, it will be
( 2026:JHHC:2373 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 5704 of 2025
read as husband of sister-in-law in place of sister-in-law.
6. Since the typographical error has occurred in the said order, further two weeks’ time for surrender is extended from today.
7. The Order No.05, dated 13.01.2026 is modified to the above extent.
8. Rest of the order shall remain intact.
9. Let this order be treated as part of the said order.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 30th January, 2026 Ajay/