Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11227 (JHR)

MD. IMRAN ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6778/2025 · 2026-02-05

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:3056 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.6778 of 2025 Md. Imran Ansari, aged about 26 years, Son of Md. Kurban Ansari, Resident of Village - Urro, P.O. Shabalpur, P.S. -Sariya, District - Giridih at present residing at Bhita Basti, house of Bablu Saw, P.O. Ranchi, P.S. Gonda, District -Ranchi. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, APP ------ 2/05.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gonda P.S. Case No. 163 of 2024, for the offence alleged under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2)(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; 2023, pending in the court of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner happened to be the husband of the informant. He next submits that the injury is simple. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that there are 13 injuries on the body of the informant. 5. It has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge, that there were 13 injuries upon the body of the informant, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 05.02.2026 R.Kumar