[2026:RJ-JP:28600] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3668/2026 CNR: RJHC020187512026 | URN: CW / 8141U / 2026 M/s Jiya Mobile, Through Its Proprietor, Having Office At Inside Daudpur Fatak, Daudpur Main Market, Daudpur Alwar, Rajasthan- 301001 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police Directorate, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Cyber Crime Cell, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. IDFC Bank, Ground Floor, Plot No. 5, Office Nagar Vikas, Scheme No. 10, District Alwar, Rajasthan- 301001, Through Its Branch Manager. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Honey Saini Mr. Vijay Pratap Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Devakriti Vashishtha on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma Mr. Akshay Khandelwal on behalf of Mr. Saransh Ghiya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 24/07/2026 1. By way of filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction against the respondent-Bank to remove wrongfully lien marked on petitioner's Account No.10160446774 maintained by him in IDFC Bank. 2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that lien has been marked erroneously by the respondent-Bank without there being any complaint against the petitioner in respect of any [2026:RJ-JP:28600] (2 of 2) [CW-3668/2026] sort of misuse of the account or deposition of any suspicious amount. 3. Reply to the writ petition has been filed by respondents No.1 & 2, in which it has been mentioned that there is a complaint on National Cybercrime Reporting Portal against the Bank account of the petitioner, which has been lodged by Police Station- Babdlamotu, District-Palnadu (Andhra Pradesh) in respect of committing Cyber Crime of Rs.29,000/-. On receiving such information, Bank has rightly marked lien with regard to aforesaid amount in the bank account of the petitioner and such action of the respondent-Bank is strictly in accordance with guidelines given by the Ministry of Home Affairs. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that except the aforesaid amount on which lien has been marked, the petitioner is free to operate his bank account. 5. In view of above, where as per reply to the writ petition, there is a complaint of Layer-II transaction in respect of Rs.29,000/- against the bank account of the petitioner and that complaint is also lodged from Andhra Pradesh and is a subject matter of investigation, at this stage, no mistake has been committed by the Bank in marking lien in the bank account of the petitioner. 6. In view of above, there is no scope of interference in the instant petition and the same is hereby dismissed. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 33/DAKSH