1 2026:CGHC:20843 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 626 of 2026 1 - Amit Pratap Singh S/o Shri Ravendra Pratap Singh Aged About 42 Years R/o Village- Ghonsa (Bhaiyathan), Tahsil And P.S. Bhaiyathan, District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Vinay Rajan Director (Personnel), Coal India Limited Coal Bhawan, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Calcutta- 700001 2 - Harish Duhan, Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, South Eastern Coal Fields Limited (S.E.C.L.) Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Biranchi Das, Director (Personnel), South Eastern Coal Fields Limited (S E C L), Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Durga Prasad Samal, General Manager (H R/i R), South Eastern Coal Fields Limited (S E C L ), Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Sharad Kumar Tiwari, General Manager, South Eastern Coal Fields Limited (S.E.C.L.), Bhatgaon Area, District Surajpur (C.G.) 6 - Raj Kumar Sharma, Area Manager (Personnel), South Eastern Coal Fields Limited (S.E.C.L.), Bhatgaon Area, District Surajpur (C.G.) 7 - R.S. Tripathi, Sub Area Manager (Personnel), South Eastern Coal Fields Limited (S.E.C.L.), Bhatgaon Area, District-Surajpur (C.G.) 8 - Gautam Banerjee, General Manager (H R/ I R), Coal India Limited, Coal Bhawan, 10, Netaji Subhash Road, Calcutta-700001. ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Akash Deep Sharma, Advocate RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.05.06 11:23:04 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 05/05/2026 1. Heard. 2. This contempt petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for non-compliance of the order dated 23.02.2026 (Annexure C-1) passed in WP(S) No.3504/2025. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt dated 23.02.2026 passed by this Court in WP(S) No.3504/2025 has been complied with. 4. In view of the above, since the order under contempt has been complied with, no case of contempt is made out against the respondents. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar