Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11220 (JHR)

SWETA TIWARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1684/2026 · 2026-04-20

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11506 --1-- A.B.A. No. 1684 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1684 of 2026 ---- Sweta Tiwary, aged about 50 years, W/o Arvind Kumar Tiwary, resident of Qtr. No. L6/54, Road No.5, Kadma Farm Area, Jamshedpur, PO – Kadma, PS – Kadma, District – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Anand Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Advocate ---- 02/20.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kadma P.S. Case No.83 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 334(1), 352, 351(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is Director of company which is in business of real estate. He further submits that one flat was already sold to the informant and the allegations are made that after treatment of his father when the informant returned, he found that the entrance had been locked and an iron gate installed. He then submits that now a good sense has prevailed between both the sides and compromise 2026:JHHC:11506 --2-- A.B.A. No. 1684 of 2026 has taken place and compromise petition has been brought on record by way of filing supplementary affidavit. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that from the supplementary affidavit it transpires that the compromise has taken place. 5. Considering that the flat has already been handed over to the informant and now compromise has taken place in light of compromise petition annexed with the supplementary affidavit and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 20.04.2026 Sangam/