Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1122 (RAJ)

AMIT S/O YOGESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4839/2026 · 2026-04-07

Ganesh Ram Meena

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14245] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4839/2026 Amit S/o Yogesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Dundawal, Police Station Ngar, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Kumar Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sriram Dhaka, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/04/2026 1. This second bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0229/2024 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 313, 61(2)(a) of BNS 2023 and 66D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 16.12.2025. He further submits that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and there is no criminal case is pending against the accused-petitioner and the accused-petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery and trial of the case is [2026:RJ-JP:14245] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4839/2026] likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the accused-petitioner so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and he is in custody since 16.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move an application for cancellation of this bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /14