Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12148 CMP No. 210 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 210 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SMT A.N.LATHARANI W/O G SUDHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.12, 1ST CROSS KAVERI LAYOUT, MARATHALLI BENGALURU -560 037.
… PETITIONER
(BY SMT.A.N.LATHA RANI ., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
SMT T K MONIKA W/O K CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.31 (OLD NO.10), C CROSS VIVEKANANDA NAGAR KATHRIGUPPE MAIN ROAD BENGALURU -560 085.
2.
SMT. D SRITHULASI W/O D MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.388/22, 8TH MAIN ROAD HANUMANTHANAGAR BENGALURU -560 019.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.RAJENDRA KUMAR SUNGAY T.P.,.,ADVOCATE FOR R-1;
NOTICE SERVED TO R-2)
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12148 CMP No. 210 of 2023
THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.11 (6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER APPOINTING SHRI KUKKAJE RAMAKRISHNA BHAT RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE, BANGALORE OR ANY OTHER PERSON AS ARBITRATOR TO RESOLVE THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS IN RELATION TO THE JDA DATED 10.02.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE A, BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition through the counsel. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a memo for retirement on
09.12.2024.
2. This Court, vide Order dated 10.10.2025, permitted the learned counsel for the petitioner to retire from the case and the Registry was directed to show the name of the petitioner and the matter was adjourned to 31.10.2025. It was made clear that if there was no representation made on behalf of the petitioner
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12148 CMP No. 210 of 2023
on that day, the petition would be dismissed for non- prosecution.
3. Despite the matter being adjourned to 14.11.2025, 12.12.2025, 13.01.2026, 22.01.2026 and 19.02.2026, none appeared for the petitioner.
4. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, the petitioner has neither engaged a counsel nor is present before the Court. As the petition is of the year 2023, I do not find any grounds to adjourn the matter further.
5. In this view of the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62