Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11214 (ALL)

RADHESHYAM MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/17324/2021 · 2026-09-28

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 17324 of 2021 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Case is called out. None appears on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present. 3. Record goes to show that the case is listed in the category of oldest pending cases in the cause list, for priority hearing. 4. A notice has been placed in the cause list specifically, mentioning that "old cases up to the year 2022 shall be taken up in the first round itself. In case of non-appearance, matter shall be dismissed as infructuous or otherwise, and in the cases, where the cause of action still survives, the concerned advocates are expected to mark them accordingly in the cause list. Failure to do so, may result in its dismissal as infructuous" but, neither the counsel for the petitioner has appeared nor has the case been marked to indicate that the cause of action still survives. 5. This matter is pending since 2021. It appears that either the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter or it has become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 29, 2026 K.N. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Yadav, Harish Kumar Shukla, Vikrant Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Awadhesh Kumar, C.S.C. (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Radheshyam Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad