Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010588712025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 30430 OF 2025 Between:
1. NEELAPU NEELIMA, W/o. Neelopu Siva Prasad Reddy, aged 42 years, resident of SF-8, 3rd floor, T.P.T.Colony, Seethammadhara N.E., Layout, Visakhapatnam -530 013. 2
2. Mr. Neelopu Siva Prasad Reddy,, . S/o. Late Neelopu Chandra Lingam, aged 49 years, resident of SF-8, 3rd floor, TPT Colony, Seefhammadhara, N.E., Layout, Visakhapatnam-530 013. ...Petitioners AND
1. THE IDBI BANK LTD, Rep by. The Recovery Manager, Siripurann Branch, situated at Door No.9-14-15, Pydah Chambers, 1st floor, VIP Road, Siripuram Visakhapatnam-530 003. 2. 2. THE IDBI Bank Ltd, Rep by. The Branch Manager, Siripuram Branch, Situated at Door No.9-14-15, Pydah Chambers, 1st floor, VIP Road, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam-530 003. 3. 3. Chodavarapu Srikanth, S/o. Rama Rao, aged 49 years, residing at Door No.54-15-4, FF-201,2nd floor, Sri Nilayam Aparfmenf, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam-530 013. 2
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to Issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction, high handed action and collusion act of the respondent no. 1 3, the respondent Nos. 1 to 2 despite a detailed representation dated 05-08-2025 legal notice dated14-06-2024 issued by the petitioners, not considering as per the rules under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the Principles of Natural Justice, and arbitrary exercise of power violative of Article 14, 21 300A Constitution of India and violation of Section 13(3A), Section 14(1 A) SARFAESI Act, 2002, and Rule 8(1) (3), Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, and Section 55(1 )(b), TP Act, and Consequently direct the respondents IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Grant stay of the impugned order dated 22-10-2025 and restrain Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 from executing the delivery warrant, dispossessing the Petitioners, or alienating the scheduled property with immediate effect and direct Respondent Nos.
1 to 2, and consider the petitioner representation & legal notice and direct the respondents, accept the Petitioners to deposit Rs. 47,42,531/- (or such amount as directed), to be kept in an interest- bearing fixed deposit, as a condition precedent to interim stay thereby fully securing the Bank’s financial interest: until pending disposal of main Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
3
Honble Court to vacate the stay order dated: 04.11.2025 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in W.P.No.30430 of 2025 and dismiss the Writ Petition vide with costs and/or pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave to receive reply affidavit dated 09.03.2026 on file to peruse and pass appropriate orders as prayed for in the writ Petition to meet the ends of Justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioners: D V V S S N H BHUJANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: M RAVIKUMAR Counsel for the Respondents:CKR ASSOCIATES The Court made the following order:
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30430 OF 2025
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)
This Writ Petition is filed seeking issuance of an appropriate direction or
order, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction, highhanded action and collusion act of the respondent Nos.1 & 3, the respondent Nos.1 to 2 despite a detailed representation, dated 05.08.2025 & legal notice dated 14.06.2024 issued by the petitioners, not considering as per the provisions under SARFAESI Ac, 2002 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 & 300A of the Constitution of India.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.D.V.V.S.S.N.H.Bhujanga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent developments during pendency of the Writ Petition.
3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is placed on record.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
5
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
_______________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 18.09.2026 PKR
6
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
104
WRIT PETITION NO: 30430 OF 2025
Dated: 18.09.2026 PKR