Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11211 (RAJ)

DR. DATTA TREYA GAUTAM S/O PRABHU LAL GAUTAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14241/2026 · 2026-07-30

Rekha Borana

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:29643] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14241/2026 CNR: RJHC020733142026 | URN: CW / 30784U / 2026 1. Dr. Datta Treya Gautam S/o Prabhu Lal Gautam, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Siswali, District Baran, Rajasthan. 2. Preetam S/o Surender Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Dalanwas, Mahendragarh, Haryana. 3. Harsita Goyal D/o Krishan Gopal Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Khirni, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 4. Dr. Raju Ram Meghwal S/o Sajan Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 294, Meghwalo Ki Dhani, Siramandi, Tehsil Osian, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan. 5. Dr. Rajneesh Hingonia D/o Nathu Ram Hingonia W/o Dr. Rajkamal Sukhadia, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 145, Ward No. 16, Tulasi Narayan Ji Ki Bagichi, Shiwaji Colony, Niwai, District Tonk, Rajasthan. 6. Kalpesh Bua S/o Girdhari Lal Bua, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 72, Dev Nagar B, Railway Station Ke Samne, Rampura Road, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Akhatar Parvin Gauri D/o Chhitar Mal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 26, Bismillah Colony, Shiv Marg, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Dr. Neeraj Jaisawal D/o Yudhisther Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o A/2, Vijay Nagar Ii, Kartarpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 9. Khushbu Verma D/o Ashok Kumar Verma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No.10, Mohalla Regran, Aligarh, Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Commissioner, College Education, Block 4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Commissioner, Sanskrit Education, Block 4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Principal, Govt. Girls College, Pokran, District [2026:RJ-JP:29643] (2 of 3) [CW-14241/2026] Jaisalmer. 5. The Principal, S.b.k. Govt. P.g. College, Jaisalmer. 6. The Principal, Govt. Shastri Sanskrit College, Mandal, District Bhilwara. 7. The Principal, Govt. College, Anta, District Baran. 8. The Registrar, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Shekhawati University, Sikar. 9. The Principal, Govt. Acharya Sanskrit College, Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur. 10. The Principal, Govt. College, Banipark, Jaipur. 11. The Principal, Rajasthan Sangeet Sansthan, Jaipur. 12. The Principal, Govt. Girls College, Kotputli, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan Ms. Kavita Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG Mr. Chinmay Saxena, AGC Ms. Pragati Rathore for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA Order 30/07/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue is governed by the Division Bench Judgment of this Court (Jaipur) in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 903/2023; State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (decided on 19.09.2025). 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Department does not refute the above fact. He submits that the petition be disposed of in light of the same directions as issued in Ram Chaturvedi (supra). 3. In Ram Chaturvedi (supra), the Court directed as under :- [2026:RJ-JP:29643] (3 of 3) [CW-14241/2026] “…….we deem it just and proper to dispose of these appeals and modify the judgment dated 23.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge as follows:- (1) The respondent/original petitioner/applicants are entitled to continue on their respective posts till they are replaced by existing regular employees or regularly selected candidates through RPSC. (2) The respondents/original petitioners/ applicants would be continued on their posts provided that sufficient number of students are available for the particular courses(s) for which they were appointed. (3) The respondents/original petitioners/ applicants would be entitled to honorarium at the rate of Rs.800/- per hour as is being paid to them presently or to be modified by the State from time to time. With the above modification, the present appeals are disposed of.” 4. The present writ petition is disposed of on the same terms and conditions as above. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (REKHA BORANA),J 98/RASHMI