Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11211 (ALL)

OMVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15266/2026 · 2026-09-28

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15266 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent-authority to release the pensionary benefit and other retiral benefits considering the services of the petitioner from 01.11.1989 as the period worked as a work-charge employee. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to provide all the service benefits to the petitioner in accordance with law. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Sri J.N. Maurya, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 3 and 4 have contended that the grievance of the present petitioner, as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Vice-Chairman, Meerut Development Authority (respondent no. 3) and that they have no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of the fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shiv Prakash Gupta Omveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) fresh representation before the Vice-Chairman, Meerut Development Authority (respondent no. 3) ventilating his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of the same, if there is no other legal impediment. 5. With the aforesaid directions and observations, present writ petition stands disposed of. September 29, 2026 vkg WRIA No. 15266 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad