Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11210 (JHR)

SHUBHAM PRASAD @ PRADEEP PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2155/2026 · 2026-03-18

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:7505 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2155 of 2026 Shubham Prasad @ Pradeep Prasad ... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party --------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 02/18.03.2026 Heard Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Golmuri P.S. Case No. 141/2025. It has been alleged that the son of the informant was murdered as a sequel to black magic conducted by the accused persons. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there are no eye-witnesses to the occurrence. It has been submitted that no recovery has been effected from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel adds that the petitioner has been implicated primarily on account of suspicion. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Regard being had to the fact that the implication of the petitioner does seem to be on account of suspicion, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Golmuri P.S. Case No. 141/2025. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Dated, the 18th March, 2026 A. Sanga/- Uploaded on 19 /03/2026