Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11208 (CHH)

PRAKASH RATHOR @ BABLU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2173/2024 · 2026-02-09

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:7294-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2173 of 2024 1 - Prakash Rathor @ Bablu S/o Ramesh Kumar Rathor Aged About 52 Years R/o House No. 89/1, Ward No. 25, Tilak Marg, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The S. H. O., P. S. Kotwali Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Kunti Kumbhkar W/o Rakesh Kumbhkar Aged About 36 Years R/o 371, Ward No. 01, Nayapara, Durg, Tehsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ..........Complainant. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, Advocate For State For Respondent No. 2 : : Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Ms. Ishwari Dhritlahre on behalf of Ms. Rajni Soren, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.02.11 10:22:04 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 10.02.2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present case, the charge-sheet has been filed. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Cr.M.P. with liberty to take recourse to law if the petitioner aggrieved by the charge-sheet. 2. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Cr.M.P. stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice sagrika