Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11207 (KAR)

SHERIN THAJ v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/13425/2025 · 2026-02-18

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10755 WP No. 13425 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 13425 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SHERIN THAJ AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O B K JQASSIMULLA, R/O 490 LIG 2, 13TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, RAJIVNAGAR, VTC MYSORE PO UDAYGIRI MYSORE KARNATAKA 570019. 2. B K JASIMULLA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O LATE KHASIMBAIG, R/O 490 LIG 2, 13TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE RAJIVNAGAR, VTC MYSORE, PO UDAYGIRI MYSORE, KARNATAKA - 570019. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED AKRAM, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAHAMATHULLA KOTHWAL., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10755 WP No. 13425 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY HOME SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE MYSORE CITY, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, 8M48 P6F, LOKARJAN MAHAL ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER UDAYAGIRI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY HCGP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, MYSORE - 570019. 4. MR MUHEEB KHAN S/O P M MUNEER KHAN, R/AT 2458/1 L 32, EREKATTA STREET, LASHKAR MOHALLA, NEAR SHAHI MASJID, MEENA BAZAR, MYSORE - 570001. 5. MRS MASIHA KHANUM W/O MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, R/AT 2458/1 L 32, EREKATTA STREERT, LASHKAR MOHALLA, NEAR SHAHI MASJID, MEENA BAZAR, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10755 WP No. 13425 of 2025 MYSORE - 570001. 6. AMEENA KHANUM W/O P M MUNEER KHAN R/AT 2458/1 L 32, EREKATTA STREERT, LASHKAR MOHALLA, NEAR SHAHI MASJID, MEENA BAZAR, MYSORE - 570001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. SHAHNAWAZ MAMADAPUR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINT THE DTD. 04.04.2025 AND TO REGISTER AN FIRST INFORMATION REPORT AGAINST THE OFFENDERS; DIRECT THE R-2 TO INITIATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE OFFENDERS AND ARREST THE OFFENDERS IN ACCORDANCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10755 WP No. 13425 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioners are over 60 and 70 years respectively and their cause for the present petition is in the allegation that their daughter-in-law [the fifth respondent], who is supported by her brother and mother [the fourth and sixth respondents], has trespassed into their property and threatened them bringing them under duress on the ground that their son, who is married to the fifth respondent, has failed in his matrimonial obligations. This Court has called upon the learned Additional Government Advocate to secure instructions on whether the jurisdictional police [the third respondent] has taken any action on the information that the petitioners could have filed against the fourth to sixth respondents. On 30.08.2025, the learned Additional Government - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10755 WP No. 13425 of 2025 Advocate has placed on record certain documents to support the assertion that upon receipt of the information, the jurisdictional police have called the fourth to sixth respondents and recorded their statement and that the petitioners have been issued with the endorsement stating that these respondents have agreed not to disturb them. This Court has also referred the parties to mediation but that has come to a naught. This Court is not persuaded to grant any relief to the petitioners in this case with the jurisdictional police placing on record the statement as recorded by them to demonstrate that the fourth to sixth respondents have denied all allegations and have even given an assurance that they do not propose to howsoever interfere with the petitioners' life. As such, the petition stands disposed of but observing that if there is any further information about a culpable conduct, the jurisdictional police shall act - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10755 WP No. 13425 of 2025 accordingly uninfluenced by the disposal of this petition. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB