MANISH KUMAR S/O NARSIRAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11002/2026 · 2026-07-28
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11202 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11202 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:29172] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11002/2026 CNR: RJHC020640452026 | URN: CRLMB / 20357U / 2026 Manish Kumar S/o Narsiram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Belaka, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Alwar (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10571/2026 CNR: RJHC020634562026 | URN: CRLMB / 19634U / 2026 Rajesh Son Of Jaysingh, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Odpur, Police Station Rajgarh, Presently Residing At Dhadoli, Police Station, M.i.a., District Alwar (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In District Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammed Zubeir Ms. Detasha Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 28/07/2026
1. These instant bail applications have been filed against the
order of the learned trial Court dated 01.07.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 118/2026 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar,
[2026:RJ-JP:29172] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11002/2026] District Alwar, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; that recovery has already been effected. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He submits that accused-petitioners are not required for further investigation and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and submits that there is one another criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner- Rajesh son of Jaysingh. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 11.06.2026; that recovery has already been effected; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that accused-petitioners are not required for further investigation and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners
[2026:RJ-JP:29172] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11002/2026] Manish Kumar S/o Narsiram & Rajesh S/o Jaysingh are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 25th of every month in the concerned police station till the conclusion of trial. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8.
The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 69-70/HEENA