- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17754 WP No. 27410 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 27410 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. VICTORY LOGITRANS PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO. 26/1, 1ST FLOOR, 6TH CORSS, VENKATAPURA, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. S.N. SHASHIDHAR DIRECTOR. 2. MR. S.N. SHASHIDHAR DIRECTOR, VICTORY LOGITRANS PVT. LTD. HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 26/1 1ST FLOOR, 6TH CORSS, VENKATAPURA, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SYED KHAMRUDDIN, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17754 WP No. 27410 of 2025 AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS ROOM NO. 39-B, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH MARG MUMBAI - 400 001. 3. REGIONAL DIRECTOR RESERVE BANK OF INDIA NRUPATUNGA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. THE MANAGER AXIS BANK HSR LAYOUT BRANCH BENGALURU - 560 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H, DSGI FOR R1; SRI. MANIK B.T, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; SRI. JAI M. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR SUCH OTHER WRIT OR ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS (ANNEXURE A, A1 AND A2) DTD 12.04.23, 18.08.23 AND 23.02.24 AND ETC., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17754 WP No. 27410 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Sri Shanthi Bhushan, Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, appearing on behalf of Union of India, has brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner's representation is dealt by the authority and an order is passed declining the petitioner's request. Therefore, citing this order, he would point out that the captioned petition is rendered infructuous and therefore request this court to dismiss the petition. Perusal of the order, which is also served by the petitioner's counsel, the petitioner's representation is dealt and declined. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the captioned petition is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the captioned petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is reserved with - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17754 WP No. 27410 of 2025 liberty to challenge the order dated 20.12.2023 in a manner known to law. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29