DILSHAD ANSARI ALLIAS DILSAD ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10458/2025 · 2026-02-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11201 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11201 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:4574] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.10458 of 2025
------ Dilshad Ansari @ Dilsad Ansari, aged about 20 years, son of Late Samsed Ansari, resident of Village- Chandapura, P.O.- Dumaria P.S.- Sonaraithari, District- Deoghar .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... …. Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 17-02-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.124 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 319 (2), 318 (4), 336 (3), 338, 340 (2), 61 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D and 84C of the Information Technology Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime by indulging in online financial fraud. It is further alleged that the mobile phone recovered from the possession of the petitioner, as per the C.D.R; has been used in creation of several e-Wallets. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 15 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.02.2026 passed in B.A. No.10299 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.09.2025 as is evident from para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Spl Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.124 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 17.02.2026-Animesh/