Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11201 (CAL)

REZAM KHAN AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/504/2026 · 2026-02-26

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

26.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.34 ssi CRM (A) 504 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Nandigram Police Station Case NO. 0042 of 2026 dated 18.01.2026 under Sections 126 (2)/115(2)/351(2) and 3 (5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Rezam Khan & others. …. Petitioners. Mr. Supratic Roy Mr. Shurajit Ray Mr. Subhamoy Patra Ms. Mahua Maity …for the petitioners Mr. Bidyut Kumar Ray Mr. Kunal Ganguly …for the State It appears that all the offences alleged in the FIR are bailable. Therefore, the application for anticipatory bail does not lie. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is disposed of as not maintainable. However, if a non-bailable section is imputed in this matter against the petitioners at a later stage, they shall be at liberty to move an application for anticipatory bail afresh. (Jay Sengupta, J.)