Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11199 (AP)

Smt. N.T.Malamma v. Dr. A. Siri

CC/1861/2026 · 2026-09-24

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010231302026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY, THE 25th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1861/2026 Between: 1. SMT. N.T.MALAMMA, W/O M.MADAGANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC WARD MEMBER, R/O KAMINAHAL VILLAGE, HALAHARVI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER A N D 1. DR A SIRI, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. RANGANATHA BABU, THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. SANDHYA RANI, THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. DHARMENDRA, THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. CHANDRAKALA, THE KAMINAHAL GRAM PANCHAYAT, KAMINAHAL VILLAGE, HALAHARVI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT REP BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of the Contempt Act for willful disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 15481/2025, dt. 10-09-2025 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: SRK, J C.C.No.1861 of 2026 2 O R D E R The Contempt Case has been filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeking the Court to punish the respondents for willfully and deliberately violating the Order, dated 10.09.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.15481 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter has come up before this Court, Sri BH.Rama Krishna Naik, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders passed by this Court are complied with, and no further orders are required in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner concurs with the said submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___ __________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 25th September, 2026. DNB/SKB