M/S MA LAXMI CONSTRUCTION, THROUGH ITS ONE OF THE PARTNERS NAMELY LAXMI KANT DUBEY v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/866/2026 · 2026-02-18
Rajesh Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11197 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11197 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:4658-DB 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.866 of 2026 ----- M/s Ma Laxmi Construction, a partnership firm through its one of the partners namely Laxmi Kant Dubey, Son of Rajendra Dubey, Resident of at Dubey Tahle, P.O. & P.S. Majhiaon, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand.
.......... Petitioner. -Versus-
1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
2. Secretary, Rural Development Department (Rural Work Affairs), Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
3. Chief Engineer, Rural Development Department (Rural Work Affairs), Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Engineering Bhawan, Kutchery Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
4. Executive Engineer, Work Division, Garhwa, Rural Development Department (Rural Work Affairs), Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Garhwa, P.O. & P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa, Jharkhand.
.......... Respondents. -----
CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate For the State : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG -----
Order No.02
Date: 18.02.2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner’s technical bid has now been rejected, though, earlier, the same had been accepted. He submits that this petition was only for opening of the financial bid.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly admits that the reliefs sought in this petition has now become infructuous and, therefore, he seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a comprehensive petition, inter alia, to challenge the rejection of the technical bid.
2026:JHHC:4658-DB 2
4. Leave is granted.
5. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
6. All contentions of all parties are, however, left open.
(M. S. Sonak, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) 18th February, 2026 Sanjay/Rohit Uploaded on 18.02.2026