HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1733 of 2011 Court No. - 92 HON'BLE MRS. VANI RANJAN AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Ms. Safia, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Shri Ram Rawat, learned counsel for the appellants; Sri Shashank Sharma, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Jadu Nandan Sharma, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Sri Rahul Asthana, learned A.G.A. for the State respondent. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 23.2.2011 passed by learned Additional Session Judge/F.T.C. No.26, District Allahabad in Session Trial No.111 of 2006 arising out of Case Crime No.90 of 2003 (State vs. Sant Lal and others), under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Sarai Mamrej, District Allahabad. 3. The parties before this Court have made a request that they have entered into a compromise in this matter and have settled all the disputes between them and now they do not want to proceed with this matter. It is further submitted that in compliance of the order of this Court dated 28.10.2021, the compromise deed submitted by the parties has been verified by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.7 Allahabad. Further record discloses that verification report dated 17.12.2021 has also been received, which is on record wherein it is mentioned that the first party Ranjay Singh son of Hit Karan Singh, Arvind Singh son of Yogendra Singh, Jogendra Singh son of Mata Saran Singh, Bhanu Singh son of Chhatrapal Singh and Haripal Singh son of Sukhai Singh and the second party Ram Kripal Vishwakarma son of Dwarika, Shyam Lal Vishwakarma son of Sant Lal and Dudhnath Vishwakarma son of Sant Lal appeared before me on 16.12.2021. The settlement/agreement letter was read out and explained to both the parties, the veracity of which has been accepted by both the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted before this Court that the Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Dhananjay Singh, Shri Ram (Rawat) Counsel for Respondent(s) : Agnivesh, Govt. Advocate, Jadu Nandan Yadav Sant Lal Vishwakarma And Others .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. .....Respondent(s) compromise entered into between the parties has been made without any coercion or undue influence upon the informant of this case and is a result of free will and consent of the parties. 5. In view of the aforesaid, this Court finds that since the parties have entered into compromise which has already been verified by the learned trial Court, the judgement and order dated 23.2.2011 passed by learned Additional Session Judge/F.T.C. No.26, District Allahabad in Session Trial No.111 of 2006 arising out of Case Crime No.90 of 2003 (State vs. Sant Lal and others), under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Sarai Mamrej, District Allahabad are hereby quashed and the present criminal appeal is allowed in terms of compromise entered into between both the parties. September 29, 2026 Dev CRLA No. 1733 of 2011 2 (Mrs. Vani Ranjan Agrawal,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad