Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11189 (KAR)

SRI. DEVARJU N.H., v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/6039/2026 · 2026-03-04

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13177 WP No. 6039 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 6039 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. DEVARJU N.H., AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O. HONNADASE GOWDA, R/A NANDIHALLI VILLAGE, URDIGERI HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR-572107. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARADWAJ K.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHSILDAR TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR-572101. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR-572101. 3. SRI. BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O. GANGANNA, R/A.GULAGUNJI VILLAGE, ARIYUR POST, HEBBUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR-572140. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13177 WP No. 6039 of 2026 4. SRI. S.G. SADANANDA GOWDA, S/O. GANGABYRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A. SIDDEGOWDANA PALYA, PRESENT NANDIHALLI, URDIGERE HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK TUMKUR-572107. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 25-11-2025 PASSED BY THE TAHSILDAR, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT, THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN NO. RRT (DIS)/316/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents No.1 and 2. Learned counsel Sri Girish M.K. seeks to appear for respondent No.4. Notice to other respondent is not necessary for the following reasons; - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13177 WP No. 6039 of 2026 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate and learned counsel for respondent No.4 raise a preliminary objection that the order impugned at Annexure-A is passed by the Tahsildar, Tumkur Taluk rejecting the claim of the petitioner to enter his name in the revenue records on the strength of the registered gift deed dated 18.08.2025. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents contend that such an order passed by the Tahsildar is appealable before the Assistant Commissioner under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. 4. Upholding the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents, the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13177 WP No. 6039 of 2026 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY